Showing posts with label prisoners. Show all posts
Showing posts with label prisoners. Show all posts

11/30/2011

Libya’s new rulers admit prisoner abuse


Πηγή: The Daily Star
By Vanessa Gera (AP)
Nov 30 2011

TRIPOLI: Libya’s new leaders said Tuesday that some prisoners held by revolutionary forces have been abused, but insisted the mistreatment was not systematic and pledged to tackle the problem.

The acknowledgment comes a day after the U.N. released a report detailing alleged torture and ill treatment in lockups controlled by the forces that overthrew dictator Moammar Gadhafi. The report says that Libyan revolutionaries still hold about 7,000 people, many of them sub-Saharan Africans who are in some cases accused or suspected of being mercenaries hired by Gadhafi.

Libya’s new leaders, who received the backing of the U.S., France, Britain and other countries in their fight against Gadhafi, are eager to assure the world of their commitment to democracy and human rights.

Interior Minister Fawzy Abdul-Ali acknowledged that abuses have occurred but said the new government is trying to eliminate them.

“We are trying our best to establish a legitimate system that is authorized to make arrests, detain and interrogate people,” he told the Associated Press. “We are trying to minimize the possibilities of violations taking place.”

Abdul-Ali said the government plans to create special security units under the authority of the central government that will handle prisoners. Leaders are working to bolster “the authority of the new government all across the country,” he said.

Responding to the U.N. report, Deputy Prime Minister Mustafa Abushagur also acknowledged there are problems with detainees.

“Are there illegal detentions in Libya? I am afraid there are,” Abushagur told a news conference.

He said any abuses have been committed by militias not yet controlled by central authorities.

Libya’s new leaders have struggled to stamp their authority on the country since toppling Gadhafi’s regime. One of the greatest challenges still facing the leadership is how to rein in the dozens of revolutionary militias that arose during the war and now are reluctant to disband or submit to central authority.

Abushagur also denied some news reports claiming that Libyan leaders are arming rebels in Syria.

“We are with the Syrian people but we are not going to send fighters or arms,” he said.

Also Tuesday, dozens of people with relatives who went missing in Libya’s recent civil war rallied in front of the main government building to demand that authorities speed up the search for their loved ones.

Most of the missing were fighters, but there are also civilians among them. There are an estimated 20,000 people missing, according to the prosecutor for the International Criminal Court, Luis Moreno-Ocampo.

Authorities have started trying to find and identify the missing but face many problems.


9/05/2011

Libyans Turn Wrath on Dark-Skinned Migrants

Prisoners from sub-Saharan countries being held in a cell at a police station in Tripoli, Libya


Πηγή: New York Times
By DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK
September 4 2011


TRIPOLI, Libya — As rebel leaders pleaded with their fighters to avoid taking revenge against “brother Libyans,” many rebels were turning their wrath against migrants from sub-Saharan Africa, imprisoning hundreds for the crime of fighting as “mercenaries” for Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi without any evidence except the color of their skin.

Many witnesses have said that when Colonel Qaddafi first lost control of Tripoli in the earliest days of the revolt, experienced units of dark-skinned fighters apparently from other African countries arrived in the city to help subdue it again. Since Western journalists began arriving in the city a few days later, however, they have found no evidence of such foreign mercenaries.

Still, in a country with a long history of racist violence, it has become an article of faith among supporters of the Libyan rebels that African mercenaries pervaded the loyalists’ ranks. And since Colonel Qaddafi’s fall from power, the hunting down of people suspected of being mercenaries has become a major preoccupation.

Human rights advocates say the rebels’ scapegoating of blacks here follows a similar campaign that ultimately included lynchings after rebels took control of the eastern city of Benghazi more than six months ago. The recent roundup of Africans, though, comes at a delicate moment when the new provisional government is trying to establish its credibility. Its treatment of the detainees is emerging as a pivotal test of both the provisional government’s commitment to the rule of law and its ability to control its thousands of loosely organized fighters. And it is also hoping to entice back the thousands of foreign workers needed to help Libya rebuild.

Many Tripoli residents — including some local rebel leaders — now often use the Arabic word for “mercenaries” or “foreign fighters” as a catchall term to refer to any member of the city’s large underclass of African migrant workers. Makeshift rebel jails around the city have been holding African migrants segregated in fetid, sweltering pens for as long as two weeks on charges that their captors often acknowledge to be little more than suspicion. The migrants far outnumber Libyan prisoners, in part because rebels say they have allowed many Libyan Qaddafi supporters to return to their homes if they are willing to surrender their weapons.

The detentions reflect “a deep-seated racism and anti-African sentiment in Libyan society,” said Peter Bouckaert, a researcher with Human Rights Watch who visited several jails. “It is very clear to us that most of those detained were not soldiers and have never held a gun in their life.”

In a dimly lighted concrete hangar housing about 300 glassy-eyed, dark-skinned captives in one neighborhood, several said they were as young as 16. In a reopened police station nearby, rebels were holding Mohamed Amidu Suleiman, a 62-year-old migrant from Niger, on allegations of witchcraft. To back up the charges, they produced a long loop of beads they said they had found in his possession.

He was held in a segregated cell with about 20 other prisoners, all African migrants but one. “We have no water in the bathroom!” one prisoner shouted to a guard. “Neither do we!” the guard replied. Most of the city has been without running water to bathe, flush toilets or wash clothes since a breakdown in the water delivery system around the time that Colonel Qaddafi fled. But the stench, and fear, of the migrants was so acute that guards handed visitors hospital masks before they entered their cell.

Outside the migrants’ cage, a similar number of Libyan prisoners occupy a less crowded network of rooms. Osama el-Zawi, 40, a former customs officer in charge of the jail, said his officers had allowed most of the Libyan Qaddafi supporters from the area to go home. “We all know each other,” he said. “They don’t pose any kind of threat to us now. They are ashamed to go out in the streets.”

But the “foreign fighters,” he said, were more dangerous. “Most of them deny they were doing it,” he said, “but we found some of them with weapons.”

A guard chimed in: “If we release the mercenaries, the people in the street will hurt them.”

In the crowded prison hangar, in the Tajura neighborhood, the rebel commander Abdou Shafi Hassan, 34, said they were holding only a few dozen Libyans — local informers and prisoners of war — but kept hundreds of Africans in the segregated pen. On a recent evening, the Libyan captives could be seen rolling up mats after evening prayers in an outdoor courtyard just a short distance from where the Africans lay on the concrete floor in the dark.

Several said they had been picked up walking in the streets or in their homes, without weapons, and some said they were dark-skinned Libyans from the country’s southern region. “We don’t know why we are here,” said Abdel Karim Mohamed, 29.

A guard — El Araby Abu el-Meida, a 35-year-old mechanical engineer before he took up arms in the rebellion — almost seemed to apologize for the conditions. “We are all civilians, and we don’t have experience running prisons,” he said.

Most of the prisoners were migrant farm workers, he said. “I have a Sudanese worker on my farm and I would not catch him,” he said, adding that if an expected “investigator” concluded that the other black prisoners were not mercenaries they would be released.

In recent days, the provisional government has started the effort to centralize the processing and detention of prisoners. Abdel Hakim Belhaj, the leader of the Tripoli military council, said that as recently as Wednesday he had extended his protection to a group of 10 African workers who had come to his headquarters seeking refuge.

“We don’t agree with arresting people just because they’re black,” he said. “We understand the problem, but we’re still in a battle area.”

Mohamed Benrasali, a member of the provisional government’s Tripoli stabilization team, acknowledged the problem but said it would “sort itself out,” as it had in his hometown, Misurata.

“People are afraid of the dark-skinned people, so they are all suspect,” Mr. Benrasali said, noting that residents had also rounded up dark-skinned migrants in Misurata after the rebels took control. He said he had advised the Tripoli officials to set up a system to release any migrants who could find Libyans to vouch for them.

With thousands of semi-independent rebel fighters still roaming the streets for any hidden threats, though, controlling the impulse to round up migrants may not be easy.

Outside a former Qaddafi intelligence building, rebels held two dark-skinned captives at knifepoint, bound together at the feet with arms tied behind their backs, lying in a pile of garbage, covered with flies. Their captors said they had been found in a taxi with ammunition and money. The terrified prisoners, 22-year-olds from Mali, initially said they had no involvement in the Qaddafi militias and then, as a captor held a knife near their heads, they began supplying the story of forced induction into the Qaddafi forces that they appeared to think was wanted.

Nearby, armed fighters stood over about a dozen other migrants squatting against a fence. Their captors were drilling them at gunpoint in rebel chants like “God is Great” and “Free Libya!”


8/26/2011

Protection from torture weakened under new plans

The Copenhaged Process could undermine international human rights law


Πηγή: The Bereau of Inverstigative Journalism
By Angus Stickler
August 25th, 2011


The Geneva Conventions are at risk as Nato countries propose formalising a much criticised system that allows them to transfer prisoners to regimes suspected of using torture.
It is a breach of international law to transfer detainees to the custody of a state where they may face a risk of torture even if a ‘memorandum of understanding’ (MOU) is signed promising that the receiving country will not abuse the detainees.

But a joint investigation by the Bureau and the New Statesman, shows that the world’s most powerful military nations are attempting to sweep away the fundamental provisions of the Geneva Conventions.

Since 2007 25 nations including the UK and the US had been pushing to establish a common framework for detainee transfers in Iraq and Afghanistan through a grouping called the Copenhagen Process.

It has received little publicity. Its meetings are closed. Its full membership is secret. Human rights groups such as Amnesty and other interested non-governmental organisations have been excluded.

What we do know is that it is led by the Danish government and as well as the US and UK, it involves Nato, the EU, the African Union and the UN. And it aims to produce an “outcome document”, which it hopes will receive approval from the UN and individual countries.

The starting point for those around the Copenhagen table is that, while the principles of humanitarian and human rights conventions may be set in stone, 20th-century law is out of kilter with 21st-century conflict. Military nations need a get-out clause from the Geneva Conventions.

Matt Pollard, a senior legal advisor at Amnesty International, said that the use of MOUs was ‘among the worst practices that states are currently engaging in’.

‘In effect, it is resulting in states bypassing their obligations not to transfer people to risk of torture,’ he said. ‘Basically states say: ‘Yes – I’m not supposed to transfer a person to you if you’re going to torture them – so please just promise me you won’t torture them.”

The UK has an MOU with the Afghan government and regularly transfers detainees. Last year the high court heard from ten alleged insurgents who claimed they had been abused after being handed over to Afghan security services by the UK. One said metal clamps had been attached to parts of his body and that he had been beaten with an electric cable.

A recent US State Department report on Afghanistan listed methods of abuse used in the country, including: ‘beating by stick,scorching bar, or iron bar; flogging by cable; battering by rod; electric shock; deprivation of sleep, water and food; abusive language; sexual humiliation; and rape’.

Allegations of torture and abuse by the Afghan security services have only come to light in the UK because of court cases. If MOUs are accepted into international law this transferal of responsibility will mean that further cases will not be exposed to British courts’ scrutiny. This would mean future cases may never see the light of day.


8/25/2011

US spies and black western propaganda



Πηγή: PressTV
By Kourosh Ziabari
Wed Aug 24, 2011


The Western mainstream media responded with great astonishment and surprise to the decree issued by an Iranian court which sentenced two American nationals, Shane Bauer and Joshua Fattal each to 8 years in prison on charges of espionage and illegally crossing the Iranian borders.

Since July 31, 2009 when three American nationals were arrested by Iran's border police, the Western state-run media embraced the news with a great deal of controversy and hullabaloo. From the time when Bauer and Fattal along with their companion Sarah Shroud were detained in Iran, the media in the West staged a complicated and intricate propaganda project to accuse Iran of violating the human rights and mistreating the prisoners.

On September 14, 2010, Sarah Shroud was released as a humanitarian gesture so that the propaganda machinery of the West might realize that Iran has always respected the human rights, especially the rights of the women; however, they never ceased their poisonous advertisement and continued to direct baseless accusations against Iran.

The recurrent theme in the misleading and deceptive reports and articles of the Western TV stations and newspapers was that the three Americans arrested in Iran were only "hikers" who had gone to Sulaymaniyah in Iraq for mountain climbing. Interestingly, they never posed the question that why did the three American "hikers" crossed into the Iranian border if they really wanted to visit the heights of Sulaymaniyah!

The Western media repeatedly stated that the mountains which the three Americans were climbing were unmarked so they could not realize that they had slipped into the Iranian border. Again, they never asked themselves the question that why should there be Iranian guards and police officers deployed at a far-fetched, unmarked territory to which few people go for hiking and mountain climbing!

Another interesting point in the coverage of the detainment of American nationals by the Western media was that they persistently emphasized in their reports that Iran and the U.S. don't have diplomatic relations with each other and the "harsh sentence" of 8 years in prison for each of the U.S. "hikers" is a result of "Iran's hostility" to the U.S. They again deliberately neglected the fact that Iran has always openly received U.S. professionals, academicians, tourists and sportsmen and treated them as compassionately as possible.

Iran's intelligence minister Heydar Moslehi has said that the two American nationals had cooperated with the U.S. intelligence agencies. The Western media blindly denied this statement and said that they were simply hikers. So, a big question pops into mind: why did they select an "unmarked" and apparently sensitive region for hiking? Why did they select the Iran-Iraq border for hiking? It was on the reports that they had resided in Iraq's Kurdistan region for a long time. If that's true, then they should have been completely familiar with the region and known that it might be dangerous for them to hike there. This was another point which the Western media overlooked.

However, aside from all these questions, the Western mainstream, state-run media which are accustomed to propagating fabrications and lies haven't ever mentioned the fact that 10 Iranian nationals are spending their life in the prisons of the U.S. and there are many other Iranians jailed in the U.S. whose destiny is unclear to the Iranian people and government.

According to a Press TV report, these prisoners include businessman Mohsen Afrasiabi, electrical engineering student Majid Kakavand and Nasrollah Tajik, a former ambassador to Jordan, who were all abducted in Europe and sent to the U.S.

Baktash Fattahi, a U.S. resident, who was arrested in April 2009 in California and charged with attempting to export U.S.- made military aircraft parts to Iran and Amir Amirnazmi, a dual U.S.-Iranian citizen who was arrested in February 2009 on charges of conducting business with Iranian companies under U.S. sanctions are among the other Iranian prisoners who are being held in the U.S. illegally.

The other Iranian prisoners in the U.S. include Amir Hossein Ardebili who was arrested in 2009 and has been sentenced by a Delaware court to five years in jail on charges of shipping U.S. military technology to Iran, Shahrzad Mir-Qolikhan and Hassan Saeed Keshari.

The Iranian media have recently reported that Shahrzad Mir-Qolikhan was severely tortured by the American forces while in custody.

Lo and behold, even if we rule out the fact that the American nationals detained in Iran were spies, they illegally entered the Iranian territory and should be held accountable for this crime.

In the United States, illegal entry is a serious crime and those who are convicted of illegally entering the U.S. borders will be sentenced to several years in prison. A South Korean news agency reported on September 28, 2001 that 34 Korean citizens were arrested collectively for unlawfully trying to cross the U.S. borders.

On May 20, 2005, the Xinhua news agency reported that the Cuban exile Luis Posada Carriles who formerly worked with CIA was arrested by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security for trying to illegally enter the U.S.

There are several other cases of detention and imprisonment for those who have tried to illegally crossing into the borders of the United States. What's astonishing is that the U.S. mainstream media have never gave coverage to such incidents!

After all, what is clear is that the Western media are not inclined to put an end to their antagonism with Iran their misinformation operation against Iran seems to be endless. The case of the three American spies arrested in Iran was only an excuse for them to spawn controversy and stage black propaganda.


7/19/2011

The California Prison System. The Pelican Bay Prison Hunger Strikers: We Are Human Beings!



Πηγή: Global Recearch

By Li Onesto, July 12, 2011


"What is of note here and something that should concern all U.S. citizens, is the increasing use of behavioral control, i.e. Torture units and human experimental techniques against prisoners, not only in California but across the nation. Indefinite confinement, sensory deprivation, withholding food, constant illumination and use of unsubstantiated lies from informants are the psychological billy clubs being used in these torture units. The purpose of this ‘treatment’ is to stop prisoners from standing in opposition to inhumane prison conditions and prevent them from exercising their basic human rights.”

Statement of Solidarity with the Pelican Bay Collective Hunger Strike on July 1st and announcement of participation by Corcoran SHU prisoners
(from California Prison Watch, californiaprisonwatch.blogspot.com)

On Friday, July 1, prisoners in California’s infamous Security Housing Unit (SHU) at Pelican Bay State Prison began a courageous and determined hunger strike. This then, very quickly, turned into a display of collective outrage and solidarity among prisoners throughout the state and beyond.

The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) initially tried to say the strike was fewer than two dozen prisoners. But they then had to admit that by their own count, more than 500 inmates refused food at Pelican Bay State Prison and that 6,600 prisoners in 13 different prisons participated in the hunger strike on the weekend of July 2-3.

This is an extremely significant and extraordinary development, something that challenges people on “the outside” to sit up and take notice. Many have been moved to support the prisoners in their just demands.

The Pelican Bay SHU is designed to subject prisoners to solitary confinement, isolation and sensory deprivation—indefinitely. Some prisoners have been kept in these completely inhumane conditions for years and decades. And the prisoners in the SHU write that they are fighting to let the world know the brutal injustices being done to them; and that they are risking their lives to send out a message that they are human beings! That they refuse to be treated like animals.

One of the ways prison officials maintain control is by pitting prisoners against each other by race and ethnicity, and exploiting and promoting other divisions among prisoners. But this hunger strike is crossing barriers that usually divide prisoners—building unity to fight the horrendous conditions they all face. The New York Times reported, “The hunger strike has transcended the gang and geographic affiliations that traditionally divide prisoners, with prisoners of many backgrounds participating.”